The community has lost control... (Was: Re: Don't put new packages through updates-testing)
Brian Pepple
bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Sun Jun 3 14:59:29 UTC 2007
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 10:41 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sunday 03 June 2007 10:53:39 Hans de Goede wrote:
> > I do not expect anyone to update all niche pages of the wiki, but is it to
> > much to ask to update a very important often consulted page like:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess
> >
> > When there are workflow changes? Sure in about a week, when I hopefully
> > truely understand how bodhi works, I could edit it myself. But I would
> > expect the people introducing such changes to atleast show some minimal
> > effort to keep the most important pages of the wiki under the
> > PackageMaintainers/ hierarchy up to date.
>
> Do be perfectly honest, I didn't know this page really existed. I lost track
> of all the wiki places things were documented long ago, and since I knew how
> to do things I never looked it up. I hate to say it, but we need another
> wiki page (: One that covers the tasks of issuing changes to workflow. Way
> back when I was a member of a change control board, and there was
> Representatives from various parts of the company and they would make sure
> your change draft covered everything they needed, and that would include
> changing the proper wiki page in this case.
>
> Could not FESCO function in this way as well? Changes require a draft, draft
> would include things like updating the proper wiki pages when the change goes
> into effect, and things like a rollback plan. Can we discuss this at our
> next FESCO meeting?
Sounds like a good idea. I'll add it to the schedule.
Later,
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070603/5ee9a8ee/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list