fedora for ARM

Linus Walleij triad at df.lth.se
Thu Jun 7 12:02:37 UTC 2007


On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Andy Green wrote:

>> And what is being produced? An *.i386.rpm or an *.arm.rpm?
>
> ...
> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> /projects/octotux/packages/rpm/BUILD/mISDNuser-arm-root
> Wrote: /projects/octotux/packages/rpm/SRPMS/mISDNuser-1.2.0-163.src.rpm
> Wrote: /projects/octotux/packages/rpm/RPMS/arm/mISDNuser-1.2.0-163.arm.rpm

.arm.rpm?

If we have i386, i686 etc, shouldn't it rather be .armv5.rpm, .armv6.rpm 
etc, or actually your current -march flag like in my current 
-march=armv5te?

.arm.rpm would be OK once the ARM EABI is employed in latter GCC versions 
I guess, or?

Linus




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list