Unwanted RPM dependencies
notting at redhat.com
Thu Jun 7 14:57:03 UTC 2007
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler at chello.at) said:
> > We have something of a mandate to keep all the trademarked content in one
> > package, fedora-logos.
> What about a fedora-logos-grub subpackage? It's easy to identify where it comes
> from, and derivative distros will need to patch fedora-logos at SRPM level
> anyway, so there's practically no chance they'd miss the subpackage (which
> would be built from the same SRPM).
fedora-logos is mentioned by name in the EULA. I'd prefer to keep it simple
(especially if we're deprecating the theming of grub)
More information about the fedora-devel-list