f7 images for mass production

Chris Brown snecklifter at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 17:57:05 UTC 2007

On 08/06/07, Max Spevack <mspevack at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > As we've seen in this thread there are a lot of things we'd really
> > like to have fixed on the pressed media, simply because the release
> > has been out for a while and things inevitably fell out of a wider
> > audience using them.  To be perfectly honest I think we should just
> > swallow the poisen pill and press the media as shipped, with a paper
> > insert warning people about know issues and recommending immediate
> > update.  We'll just pretend like we had these pressed weeks ago when
> > the isos went gold.
> I guess the main question is "is the effort that it would take to
> produce a new ISO worth the bug fixes that would get in, and the
> potential new bugs that might emerge."
> Jesse and Thomas Chung think no.  I see that others think yes.  I'm
> inclined to go with Jesse and Thomas's opinions on this, since Jesse
> feels most of the rel-eng pain and Thomas feels most of the "end user
> getting one of those discs" pain.
> If their opinions change before Monday, then so be it.  Otherwise, I
> guess I'll just use the GOLD ISOs and that will be that.
> I still think it was right to ask the quesiton, though.

FWIW, so do I. I'm not sure what the Fedora Unity folks are up to these days
- the website looks a touch stagnant - but perhaps re-spins with updates can
always be done should there be the need for them as we now know. I'd vote
for shipping gold.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070608/027e017b/attachment.htm>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list