The updates firehose
Mike Chambers
mike at miketc.com
Sun Jun 10 12:46:55 UTC 2007
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:56 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I think that most of the updates we're seeing are:
>
> 1) New packages. We're burning through the review queue but we still
> have hundreds backlogged. All of the packages that are built for
> F-7 will generate an update announcement.
>
> 2) Updates to packages that, frankly, almost nobody has installed.
> Yes, there are a ton of updates, but we have thousands upon
> thousands of maintained packages. Most users who run the regular
> update tools simply won't see the vast majority of these updates.
> (People who install everything, however, get what they
> deserve/explicitly requested.) It just looks like a massive amount
> on the mailing list.
Not knowing the build environment or seeing the insides or being a
packages/maintainer, I would agree with Jason on both accounts above as
the reason for updates.
And #2 is especially dead on. Yes your going to see lots more updates,
or at least the perception, but actually *look* at the updates and see
what they are. More than 25%, if not 50%, are not even the *core*
packages, just addons. Not everyone is updating to those, and I bet not
even 50% of the userbase is even using the addons part. So I wouldn't
worry so much about how many updates.
And besides, I see it all the time, someone reports that "upstream
released a new version, 1.2.3-5", can you please put out an update.
Anyway, just my $.02 (not that it counts or anything hehe)
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best little town on Earth!"
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list