Summary - Broken deps in Fedora 7 + Test Updates - 2007-06-14
mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam at arcor.de
Thu Jun 14 17:14:02 UTC 2007
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:52:18 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 June 2007 11:54:45 Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> This simply shouldn't be in the ppc64 repo. I've built a subsequent
> >> wxMaxima-0.7.2-2.fc7 that doesn't include ppc64.
> > Release it as an update. Update generation pulls the latest builds, and
> > only the arches available in the latest builds.
> I did release an update:
> which is what prompted my question, but maybe the repoclosure didn't see it
> (yet). ?
That's one of the reasons why you see a repoid in the report and in the
: Broken packages in fedora-7-ppc64:
: wxMaxima-0.7.2-1.fc7.ppc64 requires maxima >= 0:5.11
Jesse's advice doesn't apply, since your ppc64 build is included in the
"Everything" repository. You cannot take it away with an update. It stays
in that repo and in the metadata unless rel-eng modify the repo and
drop the package.
More information about the fedora-devel-list