To Require yelp or not to require yelp

[Axel Thimm]

On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:18:39AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:04:04AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 07:22:08PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 11:23:49PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > > Requiring yelp only because an app ships a yelp file is like requiring
> > > > evince for shipping pdf docu or firefox for shipping html docu.
> > > 
> > > Similarly, if a program calls evince or htmlviewer when clicking on a
> > > button, then it should considered to add it as a Requires.
> > 
> > So what about FF? Would you suggest that it should require evince?
> 
> I am not completly understanding your point. FF is firefox, right? Why
> should it require evince?

Because if you click on a pdf file it will try to run it.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070617/528b5a27/attachment.sig>