FESCo elections

Karsten Wade kwade at redhat.com
Mon Jun 25 15:42:07 UTC 2007


On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 09:01 +0200, Till Maas wrote:

> Did anyone exclude Docs or L10n on purpose? I did not even know, that they 
> were excluded. 

I don't think anyone did it intentionally.  But once everyone started to
draw a line where some were inside of the voting circle, others out,
that's when existing contributors got excluded.

> In fact as a maintainer, I do not know anything about how Docs 
> or L10n are organised, e.g. who decides on the final release notes or how 
> permissions are granted in cvs. So for a better discussion it may be better 
> if you name all the groups that in you opinion should be able to vote. This 
> makes it easier for Newbies like me to understand, what exactly is the 
> problem. To include everyone with cla_done sounds not so good to me, because 
> then everone in the world who gpg-signed the cla may vote, without there 
> beeing a clear connection to Fedora.

My opinion is that anyone who is a contributor should vote.  The best
and only measure we have so far is, "Has FAS account."

> Who are all of Fedora? Is this everyone who installed Fedora or is using a 
> system where Fedora is installed?

Contributors.

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070625/f6e6bece/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list