FESCo elections
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Mon Jun 25 15:42:07 UTC 2007
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 09:01 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Did anyone exclude Docs or L10n on purpose? I did not even know, that they
> were excluded.
I don't think anyone did it intentionally. But once everyone started to
draw a line where some were inside of the voting circle, others out,
that's when existing contributors got excluded.
> In fact as a maintainer, I do not know anything about how Docs
> or L10n are organised, e.g. who decides on the final release notes or how
> permissions are granted in cvs. So for a better discussion it may be better
> if you name all the groups that in you opinion should be able to vote. This
> makes it easier for Newbies like me to understand, what exactly is the
> problem. To include everyone with cla_done sounds not so good to me, because
> then everone in the world who gpg-signed the cla may vote, without there
> beeing a clear connection to Fedora.
My opinion is that anyone who is a contributor should vote. The best
and only measure we have so far is, "Has FAS account."
> Who are all of Fedora? Is this everyone who installed Fedora or is using a
> system where Fedora is installed?
Contributors.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070625/f6e6bece/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list