Fedora Core Merge Reviews
Brian Pepple
bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Mon Jun 25 18:43:42 UTC 2007
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:32 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:19 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> >
> > This depends on whether Red Hat can do reviews of these packages. Many
> > of us are under the assumption that since the packages came from Red
> > Hat, we ought to let the community review them.
>
> While you shouldn't review your own package (or perhaps also for
> packages that you're a substantial contributor to the packaging), I
> don't think there's any problem at all with having another community
> contributor who happens to have an @redhat.com address do a review of
> the package.
+1.
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070625/69a40607/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list