XULRunner - will be or won't be?
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Wed Jun 27 17:29:22 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:25 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >
> >> I see that John asked for feedback 2 days ago, I don't see a single
> >> reponse to that - do you really think that is sufficient discussion to
> >> ratify this tomorrow ?!
> >
> > John send the mail and the meeting agenda for FESCo has the item listed
> > again which provides alteast two different opportunities for folks to
> > provide any feedback necessary.
> >
> > I send feedback via the wiki as asked in the earlier mail. Policies and
> > guidelines are living documents and can (or will) be updated based on
> > feedback if there is any even after they are ratified. Additional
> > discussions can happen at any point of time. I was merely pointing out
> > that feedback was indeed asked.
>
> That makes no sense. Are you seriously telling me that you ratify
> changes that may be sub-par with the intent that they can be changed?
> What is the point of voting then? Just let any old change through and
> fix it later.
No.
> Sounds like you need to revise your ratification process (or lack
> thereof) before people should feel comfortable following anything that
> gets "voted" on.
Rahul isn't on FESCo. And I agree this needs more discussion before
being ratified.
josh
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list