XULRunner - will be or won't be?

[Will Woods]

On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 21:37 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > Martin Sourada wrote:
> >> 1. How's the work on xulrunner going (if there is someone who works on
> >> it)?
> > 
> > Good.
> > 
> >> 2. Is it targeted on F8 or not?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> >> 3. Why is it not mentioned on wiki[1]?
> > 
> > Shrug.
> 
> It would be better to write down the details in the wiki rather than 
> shrugging it off. We would like to depend on it for the release notes 
> for example rather than trying to parse change logs to get the important 
> changes from thousands of packages as being done currently.

If you've got time to chide the maintainer about it, you've got time to
help the maintainer and write down the details in the wiki yourself.

Just a thought.

-w
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070627/ae79f2fc/attachment.sig>