XULRunner - will be or won't be?

[Brian Pepple]

On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 22:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >> Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I was not aware that in writing things down on the wiki was a 
> > >>> requisite for work to get done... 
> > >>
> > >> This is sort of a anticipated response but writing things down on the 
> > >> wiki *is part* of getting the work done.  See
> > >>
> > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/FeaturePolicyDraft
> > > 
> > > Thankfully, that's still a draft, or I'd have to edit the wiki page that 
> > > I was about to send you a reply... :-)
> > 
> > It is waiting on FESCo ratification on the meeting tomorrow.
> 
> It doesn't make much sense to ratify such policies without asking for
> feedback from the people who are subject to it first, if you ask me.

I believe John did send this proposal to the lists for feedback.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070627/cb86f22d/attachment.sig>