portage vs yum

Peter Gordon peter at thecodergeek.com
Thu Jun 28 01:33:08 UTC 2007


On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 19:50 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> DPKG doesn't support that, so Debian's solution is to just call the package 
> providing libfoo.so.42 libfoo42, so when libfoo.so.43 comes out, the packages 
> will require libfoo43 and apt will know that libfoo42 is insufficient.

Great; thank you for the clarification. :)
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070627/0d13978c/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list