rpms/revisor/F-7 revisor.spec,1.7,1.8 sources,1.8,1.9

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Jun 28 17:14:16 UTC 2007


On Thursday 28 June 2007 13:04:09 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> You seem to be confused about why your "%ifnarch" usage in the spec
> doesn't work. It is because you build "noarch", where the arch doesn't
> matter. It is an arch-independent build. Unless the compose tool is
> broken, it would still ship the noarch build for ppc/ppc64.
>

<snip>

>
> This is something that has been a topic before. A "noarch" package
> which depends on arch-specific packages, which are not available for
> all arches, cannot really be noarch or should use ExcludeArch properly
> (which is another ugly hack).

Just to clarify, the (F7+ at least, not sure about Extras) compose tools do 
honor Exclude/ExclusiveArch on noarch packages.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070628/37b6ce6f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list