umask in rpm scriptlets - yes or no?
Michael Schwendt
mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam at arcor.de
Thu Mar 8 07:06:11 UTC 2007
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:35:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Rex Dieter said:
> >>> Does anybody know whether anything has been decided on setting an
> >>> explicit "umask 022" at the beginning of scriptlets?
> >> Looks like it's not a bad idea.
> > I would strongly suggest that this is something that is best enforced
> > in rpm itself rather than in every scriplet.
>
> Even better, sure.
Better? Yes. Becoming reality in the short-term? Probably not.
Becoming reality for FC-6 and FC-5? Less likely.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list