hplip: hp-toolbox advertising?

Patrice Dumas pertusus at free.fr
Tue Mar 27 17:17:07 UTC 2007


On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:30:08AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks, though I'd argue mixing-n-matching licenses within a (single)
> > package is bad form.
> 
> No, there are countless packages with differently licensed files in
> them. GPL+LGPL, GPL+(new)BSD, GPL+MIT, MIT+BSD, and on and on and on...

In those cases the whole package is under the GPL (and, arguably 
MIT/BSD are almost the same). When there are other mixes it may be less
clear.

--
Pat




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list