hplip: hp-toolbox advertising?
Patrice Dumas
pertusus at free.fr
Tue Mar 27 17:17:07 UTC 2007
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:30:08AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, though I'd argue mixing-n-matching licenses within a (single)
> > package is bad form.
>
> No, there are countless packages with differently licensed files in
> them. GPL+LGPL, GPL+(new)BSD, GPL+MIT, MIT+BSD, and on and on and on...
In those cases the whole package is under the GPL (and, arguably
MIT/BSD are almost the same). When there are other mixes it may be less
clear.
--
Pat
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list