Frozen feature list for FC7

[Peter Gordon]

On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 20:08 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> Features have not historically been tracked formally in Fedora. 
> Features just would sort of land if they were completed before freeze 
> dates.  I suppose we could improve this in the future, but is the Wiki 
> really the best way to represent this?

Hence the 'fedora_requires_release_note' Bugzilla flag? :)

Is there a formal policy for that like there is for the fedora-cvs one?
If not, then we could simply request that flag ('?') and add a note to
the package's review request (or another resolved RFE bug) stating the
cool new significant feature that has been added/changes. Then perhaps
this can go to the fedora-docs list and someone can approve ('+') the
flag when this is added or deny it ('-') with a brief explanation as to
the reasoning for its denial.

Also, the Docs/Beats on the wiki are writable to all Fedora Account
holders, right? Could setting the flag in Bugzilla automagically add
that note the wiki if the flag requester has a Fedora account/is in the
EditGroup?

Just some random thoughts here; my two cents...
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF Associate Member #5015
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ 
About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070306/19f2fa67/attachment.sig>