with or without fedora-usermgmt

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:43:51AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Don't you think somebody should make some decision here:
> > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00124.html
> > - flame, but possible pros and cons can be find there
> > My opinion is not to use fedora-usermgmt.
> My proposal is to use 100-499 for static as well, and just do static
> registrations for everything - it's simpler. It can be combined with
> making dynamic system IDs  go from 499 down as well.

Yes.

Further, I think we should exercise a little caution with the < 100
assignments and only fill that space with things that have a proven track
record and are likely to be around and useful for a while. Not, say, random
games.


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>