Filesystem-local databases in mlocate

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Fri Mar 16 09:28:11 UTC 2007


On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:55:53AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Ven 16 mars 2007 05:16, Miloslav Trmac a écrit :
> 
> > Can anyone see a problem with the plan, or an important feature that the
> > above fails to address?
> 
> 1. You're spreading rw files all over the filesystems, which is contrary
> to the FHS.
> 2. You're putting hidden directories where people won't expect them, which
> will seriously annoy sysadmins
> 
> I don't have any magic solution, but IMHO you need to think about file
> location & naming a little more.

It's quite similar to maintaining quotas (unless the filesystem is
capable of maintaining quotas in its own metadata), e.g. consider the
path information managed by mlocate the same metadata quality as the
quotas following similar exceptions.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070316/10f1e2c3/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list