Which unresolved bugs block a release?

[Will Woods]

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 13:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 19:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> > This is something which has amazed / annoyed me too, I've tried several times 
> > to start a community effort to something about this metric, but sofar with 
> > little success.
> > 
> > These bugs fall into 2 categories:
> > 1) Bugs which are simply being ignored by @redhat.com people who need to be hit
> >     with the cluebat (repeatedly)

Hey now. We're really, really, really busy sometimes *coughRHEL5cough*.
Be nice.

> > Most likely a lot of 1) bugs are already solved but never got closed / 
> > retested, others should be taken upstream (and thus closed in Fedora BZ), etc.
> 
> If a lot of 1) bugs are already solved, anyone within the 'fedorabugs'
> group can act as a proxy to close them out.  Team effort would be a very
> good thing I think.

Well then - let's start friday Bug Days again. This friday (and possibly
next friday) we can try to work through the FC5 and FC6 test release
bugs. It's only 380 bugs! Here's the link:

http://rdr.to/W8

That's (currently) 460 ASSIGNED, MODIFIED, NEEDINFO and NEW bugs against
all the FC5 and FC6 test releases. 

Next week: FC5, or FC6? 

This might be a good time to mention the recently-created
fedora-qa-list:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-qa-list

Further discussion of this topic should go there.

-w

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070322/2c9f3f10/attachment.sig>