Which unresolved bugs block a release?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:23:19 -0400
wwoods at redhat.com (Will Woods) wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 13:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 19:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:

...snipp...

> > > Most likely a lot of 1) bugs are already solved but never got
> > > closed / retested, others should be taken upstream (and thus
> > > closed in Fedora BZ), etc.
> > 
> > If a lot of 1) bugs are already solved, anyone within the
> > 'fedorabugs' group can act as a proxy to close them out.  Team
> > effort would be a very good thing I think.
> 
> Well then - let's start friday Bug Days again. This friday (and
> possibly next friday) we can try to work through the FC5 and FC6 test
> release bugs. It's only 380 bugs! Here's the link:
> 
> http://rdr.to/W8
> 
> That's (currently) 460 ASSIGNED, MODIFIED, NEEDINFO and NEW bugs
> against all the FC5 and FC6 test releases. 

Sounds like a good idea to me. I would be happy to help.

What time? Coordinate on #fedora-devel irc? 
Is there more info for people who would like to help?

> Next week: FC5, or FC6? 

Possibly. ;) 

If this is a weekly thing I would also like to see trying to help out
some of the packages that just have way too many bugs for any single
mantainer to deal with... rpm, kernel, etc. 

> This might be a good time to mention the recently-created
> fedora-qa-list:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-qa-list

Another list? :( Is that really needed? or couldn't discussions take
place here?

> Further discussion of this topic should go there.

ok. I will after this I suppose. 

> -w

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070322/e894c614/attachment.sig>