hplip: hp-toolbox advertising?

[Simo Sorce]

On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 10:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> 
> > Rex Dieter wrote:
> 
> >> Yuck (again), my simple-minded non-lawyer common sense tells me such
> >> items shouldn't be using the GPL then, but that's just me.
> 
> > The Red Hat logos are not under GPL. The package license of the two
> > relevant packages and the EULA makes this clear. 
> 
> Thanks, though I'd argue mixing-n-matching licenses within a (single)
> package is bad form.

No, there are countless packages with differently licensed files in
them. GPL+LGPL, GPL+(new)BSD, GPL+MIT, MIT+BSD, and on and on and on...