rpms/viewvc/devel viewvc.spec,1.2,1.3

[Peter Gordon]

On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 09:47 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I think there's no need to add the Provides in this case.  And the Obsoletes 
> should be a disttagless %{name}-selinux < 1.0.3-13.
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d

Ah; I see. That makes it much clearer for me. Thanks!
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ 
About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070328/e7ec2066/attachment.sig>