Proposal ocaml guidelines
tmraz at redhat.com
Fri May 4 10:09:02 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 10:58 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Sorry to come into the discussion a bit later than expected.
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>> The proposal I mailed to the list yesterday is now available here:
> >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml
> >> What's the thinking behind removing *.mli by default? Even in packages
> >> which are well documented, the *.mli files are the definitive reference
> >> for programmers. I think they should always be in the -devel subpackage.
> > I replaced it in ocaml-SDL and ocaml-camlimages with ocamldoc generated
> > html references, which seems to be pretty much the same as the
> > individual mli files.
> But I wanna use 'less'!
> Seriously, I don't want to fire up a browser just to check an interface.
> Even the text mode browsers have serious UI problems compared to
> 'less /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/list.mli'.
> Is there any reason why *.mli files can't be included in a -devel
> package? I'm not talking about the main library package where it would
> add bloat, but in a package which would only need to be installed by
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
More information about the fedora-devel-list