about maintainers and packagemonkeys
andy at warmcat.com
Fri May 4 14:50:04 UTC 2007
Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On 5/4/07, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
>> > P.S.:Packagemonkey sounds bad and we should not use the term IMHO.
>> It's a term which is precisely suited to the task. Nobody seemed to
>> offer a better one last time I asked.
> I don't mind if you call me packagemonkey :)
> However I think "Packager" would be quite enough to convey the same
You know how they all point and go HUSSS!!! in the film "Invasion of the
Well it's sort of like that except they turn you into Jeff Johnson.
But let's face it: "packager" is more neutral. Or at least packagehuman.
More information about the fedora-devel-list