F7 Zope package

Jeremy Katz katzj at redhat.com
Fri May 4 20:35:12 UTC 2007

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 21:09 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> seth vidal schrieb:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 18:30 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Rex Dieter <rdieter <at> math.unl.edu> writes:
> >>> FESCo discussed this awhile back (not sure when), and (pretty much) veto'd
> >>> the compat-python option.
> >> I find it pretty sad that FESCo is vetoing packages which don't have licensing 
> >> (including copyright/patent/trademark) or serious security issues. If someone 
> >> is willing to maintain such a package, why not let them?
> > b/c of the maintenance headache it adds to the entire distribution
> Can't be worse then Xen afaics. Or will we throw that out, too, as
> upstream doesn't make sure it runs on latest kernels? Ohh wait, I
> suppose Xen is special?

Realistically?  Xen as it stands was a mistake.  Just because we've made
them in the past doesn't mean that we should continue to do so.


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list