Selinux and package guidelines

dragoran drago01 at
Sun May 6 10:18:00 UTC 2007

David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 11:09 +0200, dragoran wrote:
>> thx for mentioning this I suggest that any package that create avcs 
>> should not pass a review. We have suchs packages in extras and nothing 
>> in the review process takes care of selinux integration which is wrong.
> Yes, that makes sense. Although the SElinux experts do a great job of
> cleaning up after us, we should strive to ensure that package
> maintainers take responsibility for their own packages rather than
> _just_ dumping the load onto others.
but it would be better to clean up before aproving a package (if a 
selinux expert is needed cc one in the review request)
we should do something like "works with selinux enforcing ->no please 
fix first" during the review

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list