Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (bz#230262)
abartlet at samba.org
Mon May 14 12:26:08 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 14:57 -0700, Margaret Lum wrote:
> Warren Togami wrote:
> > Right, unsigned in Fedora. Proprietary or 3rd party apps needing a
> > signed JAR would need to provide it from a separate source. Can you
> > confirm that it could be parallel installed without much trouble?
> There won't be any need for this, as developers can sign at their own
Wouldn't that would break the RPM verification of the installed jss?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the fedora-devel-list