Suggestion: separate gecko package?
caillon at redhat.com
Mon May 21 17:47:00 UTC 2007
Martin Sourada wrote:
> I don't want to complain much more about it, but I just thought it would
> be more effective if gecko, as is usual with linux libraries, would be
> distributed separately from firefox/thunderbird/seamonkey and maybe even
> those patched to use shared gecko instead of their own.
Google for XULRunner. I'm aiming to get this into FC8.
More information about the fedora-devel-list