What happen to Wireshark?

[Jeffrey C. Ollie]

On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:30 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> Oh yeah... I've had a long and sorted history with
> tcpdump.. The main problem is if you don't specify the
> correct arguments, the binary trace it produces is useless
> because it does not capture enough of the packet...
> and lets not even start to talk about what protocols
> it does *not* support... :-)

I didn't think that the packet dissection code in tcpdump had anything
to do with writing out a packet capture file.  What packets does
"tcpdump -s 0 -w packets.cap eth0" fail to write to the file?

Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070524/e712189f/attachment.sig>