A word on package management

J French me at semitekie.com
Sat May 26 08:45:00 UTC 2007

Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007, J French wrote:
>> On the subject of licenses, at least the GPL should exist in an RPM by
>> itself and be a dependency of all packages covered under that license.
>> The same could be done for other licenses as well and this would ensure
>> the end user had a copy on system. Of course, this would require a bit
>> of work by the package management team as the dependency would need to
>> be added to all of those package. Even better, the proper license RPM
>> could be dictated by the License field already in those files.
> IANAL, but I don't think dependency to a license file on the filesystem or to 
> a package providing one is really enough.  There's rpm2cpio 
> and "rpm --nodeps" etc so I believe the license file must be included in the 
> package payloads.
> On the other hand, once installed, some space could be saved eg. by 
> hardlinking identical files, but that won't help with *.rpm file sizes, but 
> we're not talking too big space savings here anyway.  Some numbers: GPL text 
> is about 18kB, GPL text gzipped is about 7kB (such as in package payload 
> sizes), hardlinking identical /usr/share/doc/*/COPYING on my FC6 system would 
> save about 3.4MB.
I was thinking there might be some issue along these lines as well 
(concerning the license).

IMO, every aspect of the system should be as efficient as possible, but 
if you have to download the license, then you have to download the 
license. I was mainly referring to the header information in primary.xml 
(see my response to Bill)

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list