For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
notting at redhat.com
Wed May 30 01:18:01 UTC 2007
Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa at redhat.com) said:
> This is a very early draft of what I am planning on presenting to FESCo
> in the near future:
> I am very interested in comments and suggested changes.
How are we handling builds if the arch is not hosted in the colo? Do
builders have to be publically available? How much slower is it
going to be if it's pulling the repository from far far away.
File Storage - Right this very second, we don't have the space.
Do we have fake-build-provides to handle architecture-specifc build
requirements? Is it needed?
More information about the fedora-devel-list