For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa at
Wed May 30 12:59:19 UTC 2007

On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 21:18 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa at said: 
> > This is a very early draft of what I am planning on presenting to FESCo
> > in the near future:
> > 
> >
> > 
> > I am very interested in comments and suggested changes.
> How are we handling builds if the arch is not hosted in the colo? Do
> builders have to be publically available? How much slower is it
> going to be if it's pulling the repository from far far away.

Yes, builders will need to be publicly available.

There will surely be some delay depending on the "net distance" from the

> File Storage - Right this very second, we don't have the space.
> Do we have fake-build-provides to handle architecture-specifc build
> requirements? Is it needed?

I don't think it is needed at this time.


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list