An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support
nigel.metheringham at dev.intechnology.co.uk
Wed May 30 15:06:14 UTC 2007
On 30 May 2007, at 15:39, Chris Brown wrote:
> Sun's Java is the only package I know of then that uses wrapping of
> an rpm in a binary file simply in order to force users to read the
> license agreement. Its a bit of a non-issue anyway what with the
> releasing of Java under the GPL.
That particular one pisses me off so I take it as a challenge -
fortunately extracting the rpm out of the blob is pretty easy.
On 30 May 2007, at 14:43, Jesse Keating wrote:
> RPM installation/updates must be non-interactive. Period.
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham at InTechnology.co.uk ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
More information about the fedora-devel-list