For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora
blizzard at redhat.com
Wed May 30 23:34:00 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:30 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> As Jakub pointed out, there is a burden - having to wait for
> the slower
> arches to complete a build. I was under the impression that that was
> of the main things that secondary arches was intended to fix.
> Couldn't we have automatic ExcludeArch bug filing when a build
> fails on
> a secondary arch?
I think that just having a tool that keeps track of who is behind (a
build buddy system, if you will?) is probably enough and let package
maintainers and arch experts figure out the issues.
More information about the fedora-devel-list