Plan for tomorrows (20070531) FESCO meeting
Gerry Reno
greno at verizon.net
Thu May 31 01:53:07 UTC 2007
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 14:29 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> I just joined this list because the extras list is no longer and it said
>> this is where you should make suggestions.
>>
>> For FESCO meeting:
>> I do not know where things stand with regard to being able to perform
>> an upgrade installation from FC6 to FC7 but for me this is very very
>> important. I have a lot of FC6 servers where I have configured
>> literally over a hundred packages. The only way that I would be able to
>> migrate these servers to FC7 is by a yum (or other tool) upgrade path.
>> A complete reinstall is out of the question. And if that is necessary
>> my servers will be stuck on FC6 forever. Also I have other servers that
>> I want to migrate to new 64-bit architecture from 32-bit. I have not
>> found a documented, automated way in which I can do this so that all the
>> 32-bit packages are replaced with their 64-bit counterparts. These are
>> some things that I would like to see discussed.
>>
>>
> I see Jesse has addressed some of this but one other thing to keep in
> mind when writing a draft for FESCo is to explain why the upgrade must
> be a yum upgrade vs anaconda upgrade.
Preferable would be a non-GUI upgrade path that could be performed
remotely and has the ability to restart where it left off if something
were to interrupt the process. I would not like to experience the
broken updates problem we had with i586 kernel and others during FC6
where I ended up with a bunch of duplicated packages after the update
process was restarted and completed.
> In this message you only mention
> the upgrade vs reinstall problem.
>
> -Toshio
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070530/8b895088/attachment.htm>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list