Proposal ocaml guidelines

Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat.com
Fri May 4 09:52:03 UTC 2007


Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2005/01/msg00067.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2005/01/msg00050.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2005/01/msg00056.html

Reading further into that thread reminds me of how Fedora OCaml 
_shouldn't_ emulate Debian, w.r.t. the build process:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2005/01/msg00061.html

(I know zero about the Fedora build process)

Rich.

-- 
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF     Mobile: +44 7866 314 421

Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
Owens (Ireland)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070504/4ef12b49/attachment.bin>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list