Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2007-05-02
Patrice Dumas
pertusus at free.fr
Sat May 5 10:53:36 UTC 2007
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:42:34PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > I know it is pretty bad to break sonames that late in the release
> > cycle, but I updated the whole dap stack while fixing a security
> > issue. I also notified Cristian by mail.
>
> Which apparently was possible to fix for FC-6 without an upgrade of libdap:
>
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview/libdap.html
>
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview/dap-server.html
Indeed, but I wanted to avoid having an old version of libdap through
F7, and since I updated dap-server I took the opportunity to update
the whole stack.
> Does gdal rebuild without problems?
> Has that been tried?
No. Indeed I should have tried. I'll try now.
> Library package owners really need to negotiate with owners of dependencies
> about the possibility to submit simple rebuilds themeselves.
I proposed that to Cristian.
--
Pat
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list