Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (bz#230262)

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 14:57 -0700, Margaret Lum wrote: 
> Warren Togami wrote:
> > Right, unsigned in Fedora.  Proprietary or 3rd party apps needing a 
> > signed JAR would need to provide it from a separate source.  Can you 
> > confirm that it could be parallel installed without much trouble?
> There won't be any need for this, as developers can sign at their own 
> discretion.

Wouldn't that would break the RPM verification of the installed jss?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070514/6c622b10/attachment.sig>