Legality of Fedora in production environment

[Josh Boyer]

On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 16:34 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 06:43 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 05:55 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> > > > What exactly is your point?
> > > In a nutshell:
> > > 
> > > Fedora ships packages with un-readable, non-verifiable licenses.
> > 
> > Hyperbole
> 
> I guess, you mean FESCO and FPB ignorance? 
> 
> No? In international projects, normally, standardizing languages is one
> of the first step - Apparently forgotten in Fedora.
> 
> No? Then you'll probably be able to provide a translation of this within
> seconds:
> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/python-mecab/devel/MeCab-license-Fedora?root=extras&rev=1.1&view=markup

Me personally?  No.  But just because you and I can't read it doesn't
make it un-readable and non-verifiable.

josh