Legality of Fedora in production environment

[Rahul Sundaram]

Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> It's quite simple: You have to agree on a common language (or a limited
> set of thereof) otherwise you can't communicate with your customers
> (here: users) and 3rd parties (here: authorities). For a US based
> distro, I'd expect this language to be English. 

Correct. The license not being readable is a misleading exaggeration but 
the underlying point is valid. We need review guidelines that enforce 
this and bugs should be filed against packages which don't have license 
text in English.

Ralf, do you know of other packages beside the example you cited?

Rahul