Suggestion: separate gecko package?

Christopher Aillon caillon at redhat.com
Mon May 21 17:47:00 UTC 2007


Martin Sourada wrote:
> I don't want to complain much more about it, but I just thought it would 
> be more effective if gecko, as is usual with linux libraries, would be 
> distributed separately from firefox/thunderbird/seamonkey and maybe even 
> those patched to use shared gecko instead of their own.

Google for XULRunner.  I'm aiming to get this into FC8.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list