For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:44:15 Christopher Aillon wrote:
> I'm all for working with whomever to get secondary arches working, but I
> am generally building packages for security issues, and I'd strongly
> prefer to not do re-spins because of failures on arches we don't
> officially support.  It's hard enough getting them out on arches we do.

And before somebody barks about it, I don't want to see us 'officially 
supporting' an arch that has a tiny fraction of the user base.  *cough* ppc

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070530/147f2a2b/attachment.sig>