An idea for RPM -> License Agreement support

[Nigel Metheringham]

On 30 May 2007, at 15:39, Chris Brown wrote:

> Sun's Java is the only package I know of then that uses wrapping of  
> an rpm in a binary file simply in order to force users to read the  
> license agreement. Its a bit of a non-issue anyway what with the  
> releasing of Java under the GPL.

That particular one pisses me off so I take it as a challenge -  
fortunately extracting the rpm out of the blob is pretty easy.

On 30 May 2007, at 14:43, Jesse Keating wrote:
> RPM installation/updates must be non-interactive.  Period.

Absolutely.

	Nigel.

--
[ Nigel Metheringham           Nigel.Metheringham at InTechnology.co.uk ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]