setup filesystem requires and minimal system

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Nov 14 15:58:24 UTC 2007


On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:49:43 +0100
Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:

> Maybe I should have asked first that basic question, but is it
> meaningful to have a fedora install that is not meant to be booted,
> but maybe in a chroot? If it is to be booted, I have a fairly good
> idea on what could be needed among the regular packages (sysvinit as
> init, bash as a shell, initiscripts as an init system and so on and
> so forth) and I guess that the Core comps group is about that. Now
> something that get booted but uses 'absurd replacements' is another
> issue, but it is not an issue that bothers me today (it may on
> another day, though ;-).

You'll notice that kernel isn't in the core group.  Kernel is something
that gets decided upon during install, so if you're just doing a chroot
install, no kernel.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071114/ebb214f5/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list