Review queue/FESCo after the merge

[Christopher Aillon]

On 11/15/2007 10:43 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
>> Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl) said:
>>> Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>>> * Make sure that there are no cases of Requires(pre,post)
>>> Erm, why isn't the use of those perfectly "legal"
>>
>> As I understand it, Requires(pre) is OK, Requires(post) is OK,
>> Requires(pre,post) is not.
> 
> IIRC that's supposed to work these days (FC >= 6, RHEL >= 5). If not, 
> file a bug...

Then we should consider updating our guidelines.  This brings up a good 
point, too.  If a given package guideline exists to work around bugs 
like this in the future, the guideline really must reference the bug # 
so it can be easier to revisit at a future date.