FESCo meeting today at 20:00 UTC!

[Bill Nottingham]

Ville Skyttä (ville.skytta at iki.fi) said: 
> >From my POV in this particular case, I'd be inclined to let em8300 (the 
> non-kmod package) stay in Fedora because of the above, and also because it's 
> actually possible that the em8300 modules get beaten into a shape where they 
> can be included in upstream or Fedora kernels by F9 or F10 time.

Don't we have vserver-using packages in Fedora that can't work without
rebuilding the kernel?

Bill