rpms/pam_ssh/F-8 pam_ssh.te,NONE,1.1 pam_ssh.spec,1.13,1.14

Steve Grubb sgrubb at redhat.com
Tue Nov 27 22:05:54 UTC 2007

On Tuesday 27 November 2007 16:27:25 Martin Ebourne wrote:
> In the absence of an ability for selinux to know if pam_ssh is configured
> then at least having the policy in the module would only activate it if
> pam_ssh was installed.

This is why we have selinux booleans. Its to swing permissions in and out 
depending on what's installed.


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list