Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-10-31

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Nov 2 14:28:34 UTC 2007


On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:12:34 +0100
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:

> The actual question behind this is: Are the EVRs of packages in
> testing supposed to be updates < testing < rawhide?
> 
> I.e. are upgrades from testing to rawhide relevant?

IMHO yes.  Any package that could potentially go out for a release (if
it's in -testing, it could potentially go out) should have an nevra
that sorts lower than release+1.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071102/e519ebc4/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list