When will CVS be replaced by modern version control system?
Matej Cepl
mcepl at redhat.com
Mon Nov 12 14:25:32 UTC 2007
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:12:43 +0100, Christopher Aillon scripst:
> But also keep in mind that much of the current package workflow has
> been defined by the limitations of CVS. Our current faux-branching
> scheme was in part done because of CVS, for example.
> [...]
> Returning to your original question, which I'll paraphrase as "what do
> we gain by moving away from CVS?" Not much. A small number of users
> will take advantage of the features that the new VCS gives them.
I think the thing we need to loose is the box where we keep our work-
flow. So for example, could somebody explain why in the time or DVCSs we
still have tarball-based packaging?
Matěj
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list